Skip to main content

Math (Un)Fair

It was a great experience going to the Math (Un)Fair for our last class! I was sad that my doctor's appointment ran long and I had to miss the beginning of it, but I felt I got to see the majority of the student's projects in the time that I had. It was interesting to see the differences in the students' levels of understanding of the topic. While many of the projects were quite similar, once you went up to talk to the kids it became clear that some had a firm grasp on the concept of theoretical and experimental probability, whereas some students were still developing their understanding. I think the fair could have been improved by loosening the requirements to allow for a wider variety of projects - this would allow the students to learn from each other, as many of them would have done projects on different topics.

I think that math fairs like this are a great idea, and I would love to do something similar with my students. It's interesting to imagine what a math fair might look like with older mathematics students - maybe Grade 11 or Grade 12. Probability lends itself well to this sort of thing, as there can be an "experiment" or "game" for people to take part in as the walk through the fair. So I could see this working well with grade 10-12 Probability, Statistics or Combinatorics. But I could also imagine a several different topics that would work well for math fairs. It could fit in very well on a unit on deductive logic, with students creating their own logic puzzles or games for participants to take part in. I could also imagine a fair where each student presents on a topic of their own interest - maybe explaining a theorem in depth, or a mathematical artifact they'd researched, or some application of mathematics.

Math Fairs seem like a great way to get out of the classroom and engage with mathematics, and I would love to do something similar with my students if I have the chance.

Comments

  1. Thanks for your thoughtful comments and extensions, Erika!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Three Curricula that All Schools Teach

As I was reading Eisner's article about the three curricula that all schools teach, the first thing that struck me was the significance of the Implicit Curriculum. Specifically the line: "After all, the westward movement is studied for only a few weeks in the fall of the fifth grade, but the impact of school structure does not cease until one leaves graduate school" (95). It seems crucial to think about how the places we teach in and the way we structure our teaching might affect students learning as much as the content and skills we are teaching. This implicit curriculum is often somewhat unintentional in schools. It's easy to accept the structure of the classroom and the school as something that has always existed, without interrogating what effect it is having on our students and our curriculum. However, it seems that if attention is paid to these implicit structures, they could become a useful tool. If we are explicit about what are school systems structure is tea...

Unit Plan: Inductive and Deducting Reasoning

Unit Plan Erika Thompson Hugh Boyd Secondary, Foundations of Math 11 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Textbook: Foundations of Math 11 Pre-planning questions: (1) Why do we teach this unit to secondary school students? This unit seems very important to teach to secondary students, and I was pleasantly surprised to find out that it is included in the Foundations of Math 11 course (as I never had a unit like this going through high school in Alberta). This unit focuses on some of the most widely applicable skills that we learn through mathematics: logic and reasoning. Teaching students the skills to look at information or data, make conjectures, and then investigate those conjectures to prove or disprove their validity is an important skill not just in math, but in many aspects of life. The skills learned in this unit are the same kinds of skills that help people make sense of politics, economics and world events, as well as the skills that help people make important ...

Skemp Article

Overall I really liked this article, and found a lot in it that resonated with my own experience learning mathematics. In high school I had an incredible math teacher that definitely subscribed the the "relational understanding" view of mathematics. However, in grade 12 AP calculus he was gone for a semester and our replacement teacher taught in a much more "instrumental understanding" way. I struggled more in that semester than ever before in math, much like the anecdote in the article about the seven-year-old who had extreme difficulty with an "instrumental understanding" approach to mathematics. As I was reading the article, several pieces stood out to me. I really enjoyed the metaphor of faux amis and the idea that there are not just two different approaches to math, but in fact two different mathematics. While I'm not sure I agree completely with Skemp on this, I think it's a valuable way to think about the two different ways that math is ta...