Skip to main content

Final Reflection

Reflecting back on this term, it's hard to extract what I've learned in this class specifically, from what I've learned from the program as a whole. This semester has been a whirlwind, and I feel like a lot of the most significant learning I've done has been a slow process throughout the whole term of reflecting on what it means to be a teacher, how learning happens, and trying to unlearn my own bias about who I am as a learner, to be more understanding of the different ways different students learn, and how I can be the best teacher I can for every single student.

Looking back through my blog though, I can pinpoint a few articles and conversations we had in this class that I think significantly shaped my learning. One of the first articles we read, Skemp's article about relational vs. instrumental understanding in mathematics, gave me language and insight to describe something I had always seen in mathematics and mathematics education - a lack of connection between how to do mathematics and why to do mathematics. In teaching rules and patterns instead of the deeper underlying concepts, we divorce math from it's beauty and it's purpose. I have been thinking a lot throughout the term about how to avoid falling into this trap in my own class.

Another article that has shaped my learning a lot was the one on Battleground School's. The content of the article was interesting, but I think what struck me the most about it was how it elucidated the ebb and flow of perspectives on teaching mathematics, and even education as a whole. I think as I am entering this profession, it's important to have some understanding of how things swing forwards and backwards in regards to curriculum, pedagogy, and even the role of the school, and the education system. It seems we are currently swinging forwards, with the new curriculum and the move away from percentage grades, and I am very interested to see how this plays out.

While many of the articles we read were interesting and insightful, I think what shaped my learning the most has been the conversations, both formal and informal, that I've had in and out of class with my peers. It's a privilege to be in a space with so many people with whom I share the passions of mathematics and education. It's been a joy to hear about different people's perspectives on their own experiences with mathematics, and their philosophies on teaching going forwards. I'm excited to continue on this journey of learning in the new year.

Comments

  1. Thank you for your deeply thoughtful and insightful comments here and throughout the course, Erika!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Three Curricula that All Schools Teach

As I was reading Eisner's article about the three curricula that all schools teach, the first thing that struck me was the significance of the Implicit Curriculum. Specifically the line: "After all, the westward movement is studied for only a few weeks in the fall of the fifth grade, but the impact of school structure does not cease until one leaves graduate school" (95). It seems crucial to think about how the places we teach in and the way we structure our teaching might affect students learning as much as the content and skills we are teaching. This implicit curriculum is often somewhat unintentional in schools. It's easy to accept the structure of the classroom and the school as something that has always existed, without interrogating what effect it is having on our students and our curriculum. However, it seems that if attention is paid to these implicit structures, they could become a useful tool. If we are explicit about what are school systems structure is tea...

Unit Plan: Inductive and Deducting Reasoning

Unit Plan Erika Thompson Hugh Boyd Secondary, Foundations of Math 11 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Textbook: Foundations of Math 11 Pre-planning questions: (1) Why do we teach this unit to secondary school students? This unit seems very important to teach to secondary students, and I was pleasantly surprised to find out that it is included in the Foundations of Math 11 course (as I never had a unit like this going through high school in Alberta). This unit focuses on some of the most widely applicable skills that we learn through mathematics: logic and reasoning. Teaching students the skills to look at information or data, make conjectures, and then investigate those conjectures to prove or disprove their validity is an important skill not just in math, but in many aspects of life. The skills learned in this unit are the same kinds of skills that help people make sense of politics, economics and world events, as well as the skills that help people make important ...

Skemp Article

Overall I really liked this article, and found a lot in it that resonated with my own experience learning mathematics. In high school I had an incredible math teacher that definitely subscribed the the "relational understanding" view of mathematics. However, in grade 12 AP calculus he was gone for a semester and our replacement teacher taught in a much more "instrumental understanding" way. I struggled more in that semester than ever before in math, much like the anecdote in the article about the seven-year-old who had extreme difficulty with an "instrumental understanding" approach to mathematics. As I was reading the article, several pieces stood out to me. I really enjoyed the metaphor of faux amis and the idea that there are not just two different approaches to math, but in fact two different mathematics. While I'm not sure I agree completely with Skemp on this, I think it's a valuable way to think about the two different ways that math is ta...