Skip to main content

TPI Reflections

These are my results from the TPI survey. When I took the survey I was thinking mostly about how I would teach a math class, rather than an English class (my other teachable subject). 


The first thing I notice is that the difference between my five perspectives is pretty small. This seems very accurate to me - I believe that different students in different situations need different teachers. A successful teacher should be able to adapt their teaching to match their students needs. So therefore, it makes sense to me that all five of the perspectives would be fairly equally represented. 

The most recessive perspectives for me were Transmission and Apprenticeship. This seems to align with how I see myself as a teacher. I think that the ideas and aspects of teaching associated with transmission and apprenticeship are important in teaching, but not the necessarily thing to focus on. Rather, they are the necessary baseline from which you can build a teaching practice. To be a successful teacher you have to be able to successfully convey information about your subject, and you also need to demonstrate expertise and show your understanding of the subject to your students. However I don't think these are the things that make a teacher extraordinary - rather they are the necessary minimum.

My most dominant perspectives are Developmental and Nurturing. These seem to be the perspectives that see the students as individual people with unique needs. I think these perspectives are very important in a teaching practice. In this program, professor's keep saying that teachers "teach the student, not only the subject," and I think this is what these two perspectives address. 

What was surprising for me on my TPI was how low social reform was. Reflecting on this, I think I would probable get a different result here if I were thinking about teaching English (my other teachable subject) rather than math. I think teaching for social reform, or making a difference with teaching is very important. However, I think in teaching math the difference I will hopefully make is more localized to the individual student, that to society as a whole. In a subject like English where I can select books that promote discussion about big societal ideas and issues, Social Reform would likely play more of a role in my teaching. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mirco Teaching Lesson Plan

Here is the lesson plan for my micro-teaching on making an origami tulip! Subject: Origami Tulip Class: EDCP 342A Date: October 18, 2017 Duration: 10 min Class Profile Table of 6 students Objectives The objective of this lesson is to teach students how to create their own origami tulip from a square piece of paper. If there is extra time, students will also have the opportunity to make a stem for their tulip. Materials & Equipment Needed Origami paper - 2 pieces for every student (one for the tulip, and one for either a stem or an extra piece if they want to start again. Lesson Stages Learning Activities Time 1 Hook & Introduction The teacher will present show the students an example of the flower the students will be folding, and go over a bit of information about the history of origami: Origami is the Japanese art of paper folding, coming from the Japanese word “Ori” (folding) and “Kami” (paper). There are lots of differ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Micro Teaching Feedback

 Thanks to Peter, Jing, Niloo and Brianna for their feedback on my microteaching! If I were to do this activity again either I would need more time, or I would need to make adjustments. To make it shorter to fit in the 10 minutes I could take out the background information on origami, or start with paper that already had the first four basic folds done. I think people really enjoyed the origami though, and it is a fun skill to learn, so overall I was quite happy with my microteaching. I just need to work on being better at estimating how long things take!
Post a Comment
Read more

Math Art Reflection

I really enjoyed the math art project, especially because I enjoy doing arts and crafts in my spare time. It was interesting exploring the patterns that emerged from assigning colours to the prime factors, and how different patterns emerged when different tilings of the plane were used. It was also interesting researching different prime number sieves - I have some background in that from Number Theory classes I have taken, but I enjoyed looking into them in more depth, and learning about their history. I don't know that I would use this particular project in a math class I was teaching, or that I would assign a "Math Art Project" to my students, unless I found some kind of math art project that was more explicitly connected to whatever I was teaching. But I would definitely have examples of math art around my classroom to pique students interest, and I would love to integrate smaller scale math art projects into individual lessons if they were relevant.
Post a Comment
Read more